Hypocrisy is Actually a Sin Worse Than the Sex Itself.
By John Bassett McCleary
Excerpt from
The Sexual Documentary of a Young Man
Professing moral laws, then breaking those laws and denying it, is much more sinful and damaging than doing what you want to do and accepting responsibility for your actions.
If you place moral restrictions on yourself and others, saying that they come from God, and then break those rules yourself, you are sinning against your own God, mankind and yourself.
In recent editorials in newspapers that will remain nameless, columnists who will remain nameless wrote about the sexual indiscretions of politicians, past and present. These columnists gave lip service to hypocrisy when talking about a recent sexual escapade by a conservative, “family values” senator who has been known for his moral indignation toward the sexual actions of others.
These conservative columnists were less concerned about the man’s hypocrisy than what they called “the lower nature that resides in all of us.” By this, of course, they implied that sex is a sinful, subhuman activity.
These writers made the same mistake most people do when confronted by “sexual indiscretions.” They missed the point that sex is not really a sin when compared to hypocrisy. Deception, not sex, is the true “lower nature” that resides in mankind.
Sex is no more a sin than breathing in and out. All animals do it, and must do it to live. How we treat sex, how we react to it, and how we behave with our partners determines whether it is a sin.
Demonizing sex is the first mistake our society makes in raising its children. Make kids ashamed of the origin of their birth, mix in a lot of hypocrisy about the fact that we shouldn’t live with sex and can’t live without it, and then send them off to have a happy life. Sure, that makes a lot of sense!
It was evident during the sexual revolution that some people became jealous of others who were having more fun than they were. The counterculture was enjoying itself, and that gave straight society more reason to dislike it.
It’s almost as if some people are afraid to feel good. It’s a religious thing; their churches and pastors have told them that certain activities are sinful. If these activities happen to be fun, this automatically creates jealousy in the abstainer when he sees other people indulging.
People hate their own weakness, fear their desires and then transfer that fear and hatred into indignation directed at those who are doing what they can’t do because of religious commitments. In self-defense, they choose to ridicule, and even hate, those who are not living by the same restrictions by which they are controlled.
The next step for these people is to isolate this activity, this “sin,” in which “they don’t indulge,” as something only other people do. In their minds they believe that they are not capable of committing that sin; only other people do it. So when they do indulge in that sin or a deviation of it, which they most often do eventually, they can lie to themselves and pretend that what they are doing is actually something else which is not really sinful.
These self-righteous people will often continue to condemn others for these sins while they, themselves, are performing them. This, of course, is hypocrisy, and hypocrisy is actually a sin worse than the sex itself.
When people lie to themselves, they perform the worst of mankind’s sins. They are lowering humanity and denying the common sense that God gave us as his greatest gift to mankind. If you say one thing and do another, that is deception of yourself and denial of your own common sense. If you place moral restrictions on yourself and others, saying that they come from God, and then break those rules yourself, you are sinning against your own God, mankind and yourself.
People who write columns in newspapers or make commentary on radio or TV owe nothing to the public but clarity. What they have to say is their own opinion. It is up to the reader or listener to glean their own opinion or take what information they can from what is said.
Lying to the public is not uncommon. Shock! Commentators do it all the time. Often, they do not even know they are lying, and I give them the benefit of the doubt for that. Passing misinformation by accident is a major industry in the media.
Most editorialists believe in what they say. Their information may be lacking, and their idealism may be skewed from a strange perspective, but most still think that they are telling the truth.
I become indignant when I feel that a columnist is merely writing what his boss, political peers or the public want him to write. It especially bothers me when his misinformation is destructive to mankind or to our environment.
Editorialists who misinform are seldom exposed during their lifetime. Anything can be spun into the truth. But, if you believe in heaven and hell, and preach them in your media commentary, you better have your hypocrisy squeaky clean when you meet with St. Peter at the Golden Gates!